Wednesday, April 30, 2008
White House undermines EPA on cancer risks, GAO says
Go to AP original
WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration is undermining the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to determine health dangers of toxic chemicals by letting nonscientists have a bigger - often secret - role, congressional investigators say in a report obtained by The Associated Press.
The administration's decision to give the Defense Department and other agencies an early role in the process adds to years of delay in acting on harmful chemicals and jeopardizes the program's credibility, the Government Accountability Office concluded.
At issue is the EPA's screening of chemicals used in everything from household products to rocket fuel to determine if they pose serious risk of cancer or other illnesses.
A new review process begun by the White House in 2004 is adding more speed bumps for EPA scientists, the GAO said in its report, which will be the subject of a Senate Environment Committee hearing Tuesday. A formal policy effectively doubling the number of steps was adopted two weeks ago.
Cancer risk assessments for nearly a dozen major chemicals are now years overdue, the GAO said, blaming the new multiagency reviews for some of the delay. The EPA, for example, had promised to prepare assessments on 10 major toxic chemicals for external peer review by the end of 2007, but only two reached that stage.
GAO investigators said extensive involvement by EPA managers, White House budget officials and other agencies has eroded the independence of EPA scientists charged with determining the health risks posed by chemicals.
The Pentagon, the Energy Department, NASA and other agencies - all of which could be severely affected by EPA risk findings - are being allowed to participate "at almost every step in the assessment process," said the GAO.
more...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Web Links
- ABC News
- Al Jazeera-English
- AP Breaking News
- Atlanta Journal & Constitution
- BBC News
- Bloomberg
- Boston Globe
- Buzz Flash
- CBC News
- Christian Science Monitor
- CNN
- Common Dreams
- DemocracyNow
- Financial Times
- Ha'aretz
- Huffington Post
- Los Angeles Times
- McClatchy-Washington Bureau
- Media Matters
- MSNBC
- New York Times
- NPR
- Randi Rhodes
- San Jose Mercury News
- SF Gate
- Truthout.org
- UK Guardian
- UK Independent
- USA Today
- Washington Post
- WikiLeaks
No comments:
Post a Comment