Go to Washington Post original
The Bush administration yesterday advanced a new argument for why it does not require congressional approval to strike a long-term security agreement with Iraq, stating that Congress had already endorsed such an initiative through its 2002 resolution authorizing the use of force against Saddam Hussein.
The 2002 measure, along with the congressional resolution passed one week after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks authorizing military action "to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States," permits indefinite combat operations in Iraq, according to a statement by the State Department's Bureau of Legislative Affairs.
The statement came in response to lawmakers' demands that the administration submit to Congress for approval any agreement with Iraq. U.S. officials are traveling to Baghdad this week with drafts of two documents -- a status-of-forces agreement and a separate "strategic framework" -- that they expect to sign with the Iraqi government by the end of July. It is to go into effect when the current U.N. mandate expires Dec. 31.
more...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Web Links
- ABC News
- Al Jazeera-English
- AP Breaking News
- Atlanta Journal & Constitution
- BBC News
- Bloomberg
- Boston Globe
- Buzz Flash
- CBC News
- Christian Science Monitor
- CNN
- Common Dreams
- DemocracyNow
- Financial Times
- Ha'aretz
- Huffington Post
- Los Angeles Times
- McClatchy-Washington Bureau
- Media Matters
- MSNBC
- New York Times
- NPR
- Randi Rhodes
- San Jose Mercury News
- SF Gate
- Truthout.org
- UK Guardian
- UK Independent
- USA Today
- Washington Post
- WikiLeaks
No comments:
Post a Comment